SaaS 101: The Benefits

May 2, 2007 by

Viva la SaaS!In Matt’s previous post, he made mention that the true sign of SaaS’s arrival is that it has garnered the sincere interest, and better yet dollars, of the investment community.  More people in a greater array of business roles are giving SaaS the ol’ thumbs up.

We’ve established that the pursuit of SaaS is on the minds of *almost* everyone, but what is it about SaaS that gives us all the warm and fuzzies?  For the most part, SaaS is still a nascent industry.  It wasn’t long ago the purveyors of SaaS applications or enablement technologies were referred to as the tech industry’s “lunatic fringe”.  Strangely, the benefits of SaaS have emerged and shown a bright light on the future of all those involved in delivering software functionality to businesses.  So, what are these benefits? This may read like a SaaS 101 laundry list… but to see where SaaS is going, it might be best to take another look at the fundamentals.

For the Consumer:

  • No client/server software installation or maintenance – that’s right, no more 800-page planning and implementation guides.
  • Shorter deployment time – potentially minutes as opposed to a phased implementation that could take months (see item #1)
  • Global availability – sure the technology exists to make on-premise software available outside of the premises, but we’re talking about functionality that is available from anywhere on the internet natively.
  • Service Level Agreement (SLA) adherence – reported bugs can be fixed minus any rollout overhead.  Sure the provider actually has to fix the issue, but assuming they’ve deployed a moderately efficient SaaS application the rollout of a patch or fix should happen in the blink of an eye.
  • Constant, Smaller, Upgrades – when you use a SaaS application, it is in the best interest of the provider to keep you happy and they can do so by constantly improving the application experience.  With SaaS this can come in the form of consistent miniscule changes that add up over time instead of monster patch and upgrades that cost you time and money to implement.
  • Ease Your Internal IT Pains - This is a big one. Most of the last several points here highlight that SaaS offloads a great deal of IT pains incurred by software consumers in the traditional client/server model.  This leaves IT personnel to focus on improving the day-to-day technical operations of your company instead of being called upon to troubleshoot 3rd party software or maintain aging infrastructure.  Which leads to…
  • Redistribute IT Budget – by outsourcing software functionality to a provider, the enterprise realizes a cost savings in infrastructure requirements and IT personnel knowledge requirements.  This allows the enterprise to focus on core competencies.  It also means that the cost savings from using SaaS applications can be flat out saved, or reallocated to boost productivity through other services.

For the Provider:

  • Aggregate operating environment - as a provider, you own your domain.  No longer are you sending technicians to fix or customize your software because it doesn’t fit into a customer’s highly-specialized (or horribly outdated) infrastructure.  You have complete control to optimize an infrastructure to your SaaS application’s specific requirements.  This is synergy at its best, and leads to financial savings as well as less headaches.
  • Predictable Revenue Stream - the subscription model associated with SaaS means that your customers will pay you on a recurring schedule.  If you make this cycle flexible enough, you can get a real handle on forecasting revenues.  The payment may be tied to your product (think cell phone plans) where everybody pays according to the same term, or tied to your individual subscribers where some may pay monthly, some yearly, and some quarterly.  In my opinion, the more flexible you are with this piece of the offering the better.  Either way, because of the scheduled nature of cash inflow, revenue modeling becomes more reliable.
  • Predictable Growth - Same as above, but here we’re talking about sheer volume of subscribership.  The fact that users hit your site to access the application means that with the right tools you can monitor their usage pretty closely – something that’s not so easy with all your customers running the application on premise.
  • Focus On Smaller Upgrades Instead of Monster Patch Rollouts – and while you’re at it, don’t worry about rollout logistics across all of your customer sites either.  Your development teams can focus on fixing core application functionality, tackling bugs and enhancing features in smaller incremental rollouts because it’s just easier to do so.
  • Sales Becomes Customer Relationship Management – When you are selling a subscribable service, the game of gaining subscribership becomes one of balancing user retention vs. attrition more than a game of landing the ‘big deals’.  Sure, it’s important to have a team out there pounding the pavement to sell your application – i.e. getting subscribers in the door - but the real thrust of the new sales and marketing in SaaS is customer relationship management.  The equation becomes quite simple – keep retention rates higher than attrition rates and focus on bringing in new customers.

Adoption of the model has been growing at well over 20% year over year, Nick Carr says (paraphrased) that SaaS adoption is set to explode and reports that McKinsey & Co. will release a survey showing that 61 percent of CIOs at North American companies with sales over $1 billion are already planning to adopt one or more SaaS application.  Additionally he says that Deutsche Bank projected that the SaaS market will account for half of the application software spend by 2013, Gartner predicts that SaaS will triple in size by 2011 from 2006, Jeff Kaplan thinks SaaS adoption is underrated and the success of companies like SalesForce.com should be enough to convince even the most skeptical, but if all of this is still not enough and you are having trouble convincing your customers, your boss or yourself into adopting SaaS, here is a list of benefits to consider.

What do you think? Have you experienced other benefits already? On the contrary, have you experienced major drawbacks? We would love to know what’s holding you back or what has pushed you forward!

read more

The SaaS Investment Landscape

Apr 27, 2007 by

Although many in the SaaS-choir have long since been sold on SaaS, it seems that venture capitalists are finally joining us.  Existing firms are padding their portfolios with SaaS companies.  More interesting, though, is the fact that firms are forming with core strategies focused on SaaS investment.  Why is this?  Perhaps the most definitive evidence comes from market research as illustrated in Phil Wainewright’s most recent article “Resistance fades as SaaS goes mainstream”.  Bullet points like ‘Adoption is surging‘, ‘Resistance is fading‘, and ‘Deployments are multiplying‘ instill great confidence in the minds of financiers. That’s right, as investors see more research from sources such as Gartner and Saugatuck indicating that SaaS is viable and sustainable, it becomes a much prettier investment picture.

As always, the proof is in the proverbial pudding:

Warren Weis from Foundation Capital says “Software as a service is clearly a very interesting area because of the ease of selling into these types of environments where users can use it without a big IT implementation … We have about 11 of these types of (SaaS) investments and they’re doing very well… we’re looking for new investments in that area.”

Jeff Horing from Insight Venture Partners says ”SaaS offers a more predictable revenue stream and lower research and development expenses to software vendors than packaged software products.”  He continues, “Overall, if you can build a successful company it’s a much better business model than license sales.”

Horing says he and other investors at his firm are skeptical about growth for companies looking to make their mark by selling enterprise software applications, as opposed to those that market the SaaS model.

VCs have had time to watch the progress of early SaaS companies.  They’ve seen stability and better yet, growth.  Evidence is found in the performance of these four SaaS companies over the past two years (CRM, RNOW, VOCS, and SVVS):

 Comparison of SaaS company stock prices.
(bigger)

It’s no wonder SaaS companies whet the VC community’s collective appetite. IPO valuations of SaaS companies such as SalesForce.com, NetSuite and RightNow Technologies have come in as high as 10X revenue (although not the general case)!  Now there’s a nice exit.

Obviously, SaaS investments come with considerations, both positive and negative.

The Pros

  • Demand from the enterprise IT community
  • Predictable and stable revenue
  • Predictable cashflow and growth
  • The market for SaaS is expected to grow to 25% of all new business software by 2011 (Gartner)
  • SaaS is an easier sell than traditional packaged software
  • See Wainewright’s article for more.

The Cons

  • A longer time to achieve cashflow positive (longer development times and amortized revenue model)
  • Higher startup capital requirements

What do you think? Are you looking to invest in SaaS companies? Are you planning any SaaS deployments within your organization? What’s holding your back? We would love to know your thoughts, share them though comments!

read more

Get Ready for SaaS, says Gartner

Mar 14, 2007 by

Via Business Two Zero, here is a press release recently issued by Gartner titled Gartner Says Service Providers Must Prepare Now for the Software as a Service Wave. The release opens with numbers: The worldwide SaaS market reached $6.3 billion in 2006, with a forecast of growth to $19.3 billion by year-end 2011.

I want to focus on a portion of the release that stuck out most to me. As I spend my days working at a company that aims to be the driver for ISVs’ SaaS strategies, my mind is trained to pick up on the subtle urgency behind this statement:

“Although the SaaS market is still relatively small, service providers need to make important strategic decisions now.”

Ok, maybe it’s not so subtle. Either way, here’s Gartner’s preliminary list of things that SaaS vendors should do to stay ahead of the SaaS ‘wave’ (by the way, ‘wave’ is their wording. I don’t like labeling SaaS a ‘wave’ – it’s just too fundamental and far-reaching of a shift.) Nevertheless, from Gartner:

“Use solutions built on next-generation Web services, SOAs and highly automated server farms to produce multitenant, mass-customizable solutions that facilitate agility while sustaining uniqueness at a reduced cost”.

“Make strategic decisions around whether to offer SaaS as simply one element of a broader portfolio or to fully evolve toward a SaaS-based delivery model”.

“Act now because of the scale of change required to successfully exploit SaaS opportunities”.

“Conduct thorough due diligence to be well-placed to take advantage of opportunities and manage risk as the market evolves toward SaaS”.

Egads! Not that it’s a surprise around here, but this further illustrates that the shift from software vendor to service provider will require herculean efforts on the part of SaaS providers – startups and existing vendors alike. It will be very interesting to see how this all shakes out; and from our perspective at Apprenda, how SaaS platforms will be perceived and utilized to address these 4 vendor pain points and beyond. The gateway for SaaS platforms to enter the market is, of course, first through the perception that the notion of the platform does indeed satisfy, ease, or otherwise unburden as many of these hurdles and new responsibilities as possible.

Given that, if history is any indicator Gartner’s list of things that SaaS vendors should do to prepare for SaaS will evolve quickly into a veritable checklist of things that SaaS vendors will look to outsource to a SaaS platform.

Are you currently developing a SaaS app? Are you using enablement technologies (such as platforms or libraries)? What are the pain points that you think should be addressed and which ones where the ones you had the most trouble with? We would love to know your thoughts and experiences!

read more