<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: According to ISVs, Salesforce&#8217;s Force.com is Not the Platform for SaaS</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.saasblogs.com/2008/03/03/according-to-isvs-salesforces-forcecom-is-not-the-platform-for-saas/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.saasblogs.com/2008/03/03/according-to-isvs-salesforces-forcecom-is-not-the-platform-for-saas/</link>
	<description>Understanding the Software as a Service Revolution</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 15:25:11 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Software as Services mobile edition</title>
		<link>http://www.saasblogs.com/2008/03/03/according-to-isvs-salesforces-forcecom-is-not-the-platform-for-saas/#comment-37702</link>
		<dc:creator>Software as Services mobile edition</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Mar 2008 20:55:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.saasblogs.com/2008/03/03/according-to-isvs-salesforces-forcecom-is-not-the-platform-for-saas/#comment-37702</guid>
		<description>[...] About that show of hands. I didn&#8217;t expect my straw poll at last week&#8217;s SaaS Summit would produce only two hesitant supporters for Salesforce.com&#8217;s Force.com platform-as-a-service model out of a room full of two or three hundred ISVs. But this was a conference organized by specialist SaaS hoster OpSource, and even though the OpSource team does a great job of making this an event of interest to the entire industry, you&#8217;d still have to expect the attendees would skew towards favoring OpSource&#8217;s managed hosting model. A similar straw poll at a Force.com event would probably skew in the exact opposite direction in favor of Salesforce.com&#8217;s more packaged platform. To arrive at any other conclusion is mischievous at best. [Disclosure: Salesforce.com and OpSource are both clients, OpSource funded my travel costs to be at the event.] [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] About that show of hands. I didn&#8217;t expect my straw poll at last week&#8217;s SaaS Summit would produce only two hesitant supporters for Salesforce.com&#8217;s Force.com platform-as-a-service model out of a room full of two or three hundred ISVs. But this was a conference organized by specialist SaaS hoster OpSource, and even though the OpSource team does a great job of making this an event of interest to the entire industry, you&#8217;d still have to expect the attendees would skew towards favoring OpSource&#8217;s managed hosting model. A similar straw poll at a Force.com event would probably skew in the exact opposite direction in favor of Salesforce.com&#8217;s more packaged platform. To arrive at any other conclusion is mischievous at best. [Disclosure: Salesforce.com and OpSource are both clients, OpSource funded my travel costs to be at the event.] [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: links for 2008-03-04 &#171; The Adventures of Geekgirl</title>
		<link>http://www.saasblogs.com/2008/03/03/according-to-isvs-salesforces-forcecom-is-not-the-platform-for-saas/#comment-37312</link>
		<dc:creator>links for 2008-03-04 &#171; The Adventures of Geekgirl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Mar 2008 02:29:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.saasblogs.com/2008/03/03/according-to-isvs-salesforces-forcecom-is-not-the-platform-for-saas/#comment-37312</guid>
		<description>[...] SaaS Blogs - » According to ISVs, Salesforce’s Force.com is Not the Platform for SaaS (tags: saas salesforce.com force.com platform isvs isv opsource) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] SaaS Blogs - » According to ISVs, Salesforce’s Force.com is Not the Platform for SaaS (tags: saas salesforce.com force.com platform isvs isv opsource) [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: No Love for Force.com &#124; Warrior Point - Latest News and Tutorials on Salesforce.com, SaaS, and on-demand software</title>
		<link>http://www.saasblogs.com/2008/03/03/according-to-isvs-salesforces-forcecom-is-not-the-platform-for-saas/#comment-37262</link>
		<dc:creator>No Love for Force.com &#124; Warrior Point - Latest News and Tutorials on Salesforce.com, SaaS, and on-demand software</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Mar 2008 20:50:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.saasblogs.com/2008/03/03/according-to-isvs-salesforces-forcecom-is-not-the-platform-for-saas/#comment-37262</guid>
		<description>[...] Posted March 3rd @ 3:50 pm by Darren   A good discussion has ignited within the SaaS community. I first caught this on a post by Sinclair Schuller from SaaS Blogs. Salesforce&#8217;s PaaS model has drawn criticism ever since it was launched. At a recent OpSource Summit, Phil Wainewright conducted an informal &#8217;show of hands&#8217; survey and the results reignited the debate of whether Force.com makes sense for ISVs. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Posted March 3rd @ 3:50 pm by Darren   A good discussion has ignited within the SaaS community. I first caught this on a post by Sinclair Schuller from SaaS Blogs. Salesforce&#8217;s PaaS model has drawn criticism ever since it was launched. At a recent OpSource Summit, Phil Wainewright conducted an informal &#8217;show of hands&#8217; survey and the results reignited the debate of whether Force.com makes sense for ISVs. [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Who is using Force.com? at diversity.net.nz</title>
		<link>http://www.saasblogs.com/2008/03/03/according-to-isvs-salesforces-forcecom-is-not-the-platform-for-saas/#comment-37251</link>
		<dc:creator>Who is using Force.com? at diversity.net.nz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Mar 2008 19:17:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.saasblogs.com/2008/03/03/according-to-isvs-salesforces-forcecom-is-not-the-platform-for-saas/#comment-37251</guid>
		<description>[...] A number of prominent blogs including Renee Boucher Ferguson, Sinclair Schuller and Bob Warfield this morning wrote about the outcome of an informal straw poll conducted during a panel discussion hosted by Phil Wainewright at the OpSource SaaS summit this week. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] A number of prominent blogs including Renee Boucher Ferguson, Sinclair Schuller and Bob Warfield this morning wrote about the outcome of an informal straw poll conducted during a panel discussion hosted by Phil Wainewright at the OpSource SaaS summit this week. [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sinclair Schuller</title>
		<link>http://www.saasblogs.com/2008/03/03/according-to-isvs-salesforces-forcecom-is-not-the-platform-for-saas/#comment-37236</link>
		<dc:creator>Sinclair Schuller</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Mar 2008 16:47:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.saasblogs.com/2008/03/03/according-to-isvs-salesforces-forcecom-is-not-the-platform-for-saas/#comment-37236</guid>
		<description>Bob, thanks for the note. I actually hadn't approached the economics at all. You're absolutely correct: at $50.00 a seat, there's no lunch left for the ISV.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bob, thanks for the note. I actually hadn&#8217;t approached the economics at all. You&#8217;re absolutely correct: at $50.00 a seat, there&#8217;s no lunch left for the ISV.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob Warfield</title>
		<link>http://www.saasblogs.com/2008/03/03/according-to-isvs-salesforces-forcecom-is-not-the-platform-for-saas/#comment-37233</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob Warfield</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Mar 2008 16:28:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.saasblogs.com/2008/03/03/according-to-isvs-salesforces-forcecom-is-not-the-platform-for-saas/#comment-37233</guid>
		<description>The poll was definitely representative.  I've talked to a number of Silicon Valley companies about the topic.  But Sinclair, you've missed the biggest issue with Force for ISV's:  it's economic suicide to live with the price.  You just can't succeed.

More on my blog:

http://smoothspan.wordpress.com/2008/03/03/isvs-say-no-to-forcecom/

Cheers,

BW</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The poll was definitely representative.  I&#8217;ve talked to a number of Silicon Valley companies about the topic.  But Sinclair, you&#8217;ve missed the biggest issue with Force for ISV&#8217;s:  it&#8217;s economic suicide to live with the price.  You just can&#8217;t succeed.</p>
<p>More on my blog:</p>
<p><a href="http://smoothspan.wordpress.com/2008/03/03/isvs-say-no-to-forcecom/" rel="nofollow">http://smoothspan.wordpress.com/2008/03/03/isvs-say-no-to-forcecom/</a></p>
<p>Cheers,</p>
<p>BW</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ISVs Say &#8220;No&#8221; to Force.com &#171; SmoothSpan Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.saasblogs.com/2008/03/03/according-to-isvs-salesforces-forcecom-is-not-the-platform-for-saas/#comment-37232</link>
		<dc:creator>ISVs Say &#8220;No&#8221; to Force.com &#171; SmoothSpan Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Mar 2008 16:27:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.saasblogs.com/2008/03/03/according-to-isvs-salesforces-forcecom-is-not-the-platform-for-saas/#comment-37232</guid>
		<description>[...] Posted by smoothspan on March 3, 2008  There are a couple of interesting posts from Sinclair Schuller and Renee Boucher Ferguson about an incident that took place at the OpSource SaaS Summit in San Francisco recently.  Apparently Phil Wainewright conducted a show of hands survey about the attendees intentions with respect to SaaS.  They had three choices.  [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Posted by smoothspan on March 3, 2008  There are a couple of interesting posts from Sinclair Schuller and Renee Boucher Ferguson about an incident that took place at the OpSource SaaS Summit in San Francisco recently.  Apparently Phil Wainewright conducted a show of hands survey about the attendees intentions with respect to SaaS.  They had three choices.  [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
