<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: How Complex Can SaaS Offerings Get?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.saasblogs.com/2008/02/14/how-complex-can-saas-offerings-get/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.saasblogs.com/saas/how-complex-can-saas-offerings-get/</link>
	<description>Understanding the &#34;as a Service&#34; Revolution</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2012 05:34:07 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: CADaaS continued (2) &#124; Extranet Evolution</title>
		<link>http://www.saasblogs.com/saas/how-complex-can-saas-offerings-get/#comment-140528</link>
		<dc:creator>CADaaS continued (2) &#124; Extranet Evolution</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 May 2011 09:52:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.saasblogs.com/2008/02/14/how-complex-can-saas-offerings-get/#comment-140528</guid>
		<description>[...] week (here and here) on CAD-as-a-Service have stimulated some interest, including a SaaSblogs post, and a comment from Rami Hamodah, who, quite rightly, suggests that &#8220;offering [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] week (here and here) on CAD-as-a-Service have stimulated some interest, including a SaaSblogs post, and a comment from Rami Hamodah, who, quite rightly, suggests that &#8220;offering [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sinclair Schuller</title>
		<link>http://www.saasblogs.com/saas/how-complex-can-saas-offerings-get/#comment-35231</link>
		<dc:creator>Sinclair Schuller</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Feb 2008 04:23:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.saasblogs.com/2008/02/14/how-complex-can-saas-offerings-get/#comment-35231</guid>
		<description>Yossi, I&#039;m glad you&#039;ve highlighted the word &quot;excuse&quot; over &quot;reason.&quot; 

I urge that all software companies take a look at the SaaS model. It may or may not make sense from a business perspective, but if it does make sense, don&#039;t let &quot;excuses&quot; get in the way of eased distribution and recurring revenue!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yossi, I&#8217;m glad you&#8217;ve highlighted the word &#8220;excuse&#8221; over &#8220;reason.&#8221; </p>
<p>I urge that all software companies take a look at the SaaS model. It may or may not make sense from a business perspective, but if it does make sense, don&#8217;t let &#8220;excuses&#8221; get in the way of eased distribution and recurring revenue!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Franck Martin</title>
		<link>http://www.saasblogs.com/saas/how-complex-can-saas-offerings-get/#comment-35141</link>
		<dc:creator>Franck Martin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Feb 2008 13:58:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.saasblogs.com/2008/02/14/how-complex-can-saas-offerings-get/#comment-35141</guid>
		<description>There are no limits on what application can be provided on the Internet. It is funny in a way to go back to &quot;centralised&quot; computing.
I guess IT departments, will become networking departments to ensure reliable connectivity. I think the main issue in having SaaS is evolving around the privacy of the data.
Franck Martin - www.avonsys.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There are no limits on what application can be provided on the Internet. It is funny in a way to go back to &#8220;centralised&#8221; computing.<br />
I guess IT departments, will become networking departments to ensure reliable connectivity. I think the main issue in having SaaS is evolving around the privacy of the data.<br />
Franck Martin &#8211; <a href="http://www.avonsys.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.avonsys.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Yossi Cohen</title>
		<link>http://www.saasblogs.com/saas/how-complex-can-saas-offerings-get/#comment-35033</link>
		<dc:creator>Yossi Cohen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Feb 2008 12:32:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.saasblogs.com/2008/02/14/how-complex-can-saas-offerings-get/#comment-35033</guid>
		<description></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I share your vision: there is no reason for any software app to be on-premise. </p>
<p>However, the industry tries to rationalize why it should go saas. So the first class of apps to go saas was CRM, and the formal &#8220;excuse&#8221; for going against the mainstream (i.e. being on-premise) was that  sales people were mobile and needed access from anywhere. </p>
<p>CAD, BI (like LuucidEra), and my company, Panaya, which runs computing intensive code analytics on a grid to provide impact analysis of changes on SAP systems, probably belong to a class of companies which has a new &#8220;excuse&#8221; &#8211; our apps are computing intensive, and therefore it doesn&#8217;t make sense for each customer to have its own infrastructure required by the app.</p>
<p>Nevertheless, I call it an &#8220;excuse&#8221; rather than a reason, since the fundamental reason for becoming saas (and my motivation to have my product this way) is relevant to any software company: to make my product easier to consume and distribute and by that to allow high growth of the company. </p>
<p>Yossi Cohen, founder and CEO, Panaya Inc. – Impact analysis for SAP.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

