<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Will &#8216;Beta&#8217; Fly in B2B SaaS?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.saasblogs.com/2007/05/09/will-beta-fly-in-b2b-saas/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.saasblogs.com/business/will-beta-fly-in-b2b-saas/</link>
	<description>Understanding the &#34;as a Service&#34; Revolution</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2012 05:34:07 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sinclair Schuller</title>
		<link>http://www.saasblogs.com/business/will-beta-fly-in-b2b-saas/#comment-5053</link>
		<dc:creator>Sinclair Schuller</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 May 2007 14:47:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.saasblogs.com/2007/05/09/will-beta-fly-in-b2b-saas/#comment-5053</guid>
		<description>Good point Anshu. I&#039;ve never thought of it that way. I suppose read-only has a certain safety associated with it since there is no two-way dependence, and you can walk into a read only scenario with little effort. 

Transactional would require you to join the beta and put effort and trust in writing data, making &#039;beta&#039; a not so appealing concept, particularly B2B. Imagine finding a great tool (say, online super spreadsheet) and porting your Excel files, only to find that the move from &#039;beta&#039; to &#039;gamma&#039; or whatever violated the sanctity of your work. Yuck.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good point Anshu. I&#8217;ve never thought of it that way. I suppose read-only has a certain safety associated with it since there is no two-way dependence, and you can walk into a read only scenario with little effort. </p>
<p>Transactional would require you to join the beta and put effort and trust in writing data, making &#8216;beta&#8217; a not so appealing concept, particularly B2B. Imagine finding a great tool (say, online super spreadsheet) and porting your Excel files, only to find that the move from &#8216;beta&#8217; to &#8216;gamma&#8217; or whatever violated the sanctity of your work. Yuck.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anshu Sharma</title>
		<link>http://www.saasblogs.com/business/will-beta-fly-in-b2b-saas/#comment-5031</link>
		<dc:creator>Anshu Sharma</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 May 2007 00:40:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.saasblogs.com/2007/05/09/will-beta-fly-in-b2b-saas/#comment-5031</guid>
		<description>It would work for read-only B2B services such as say wall street data streaming where beta may imply say only a subset of companies are covered. For transactional services, it may not work.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It would work for read-only B2B services such as say wall street data streaming where beta may imply say only a subset of companies are covered. For transactional services, it may not work.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mike</title>
		<link>http://www.saasblogs.com/business/will-beta-fly-in-b2b-saas/#comment-4606</link>
		<dc:creator>mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 May 2007 17:18:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.saasblogs.com/2007/05/09/will-beta-fly-in-b2b-saas/#comment-4606</guid>
		<description>i believe hotmail announced yesterday they are not in beta...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i believe hotmail announced yesterday they are not in beta&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

