The SaaS Investment Landscape


Although many in the SaaS-choir have long since been sold on SaaS, it seems that venture capitalists are finally joining us.  Existing firms are padding their portfolios with SaaS companies.  More interesting, though, is the fact that firms are forming with core strategies focused on SaaS investment.  Why is this?  Perhaps the most definitive evidence comes from market research as illustrated in Phil Wainewright’s most recent article “Resistance fades as SaaS goes mainstream”.  Bullet points like ‘Adoption is surging‘, ‘Resistance is fading‘, and ‘Deployments are multiplying‘ instill great confidence in the minds of financiers. That’s right, as investors see more research from sources such as Gartner and Saugatuck indicating that SaaS is viable and sustainable, it becomes a much prettier investment picture.

As always, the proof is in the proverbial pudding:

Warren Weis from Foundation Capital says “Software as a service is clearly a very interesting area because of the ease of selling into these types of environments where users can use it without a big IT implementation … We have about 11 of these types of (SaaS) investments and they’re doing very well… we’re looking for new investments in that area.”

Jeff Horing from Insight Venture Partners says ”SaaS offers a more predictable revenue stream and lower research and development expenses to software vendors than packaged software products.”  He continues, “Overall, if you can build a successful company it’s a much better business model than license sales.”

Horing says he and other investors at his firm are skeptical about growth for companies looking to make their mark by selling enterprise software applications, as opposed to those that market the SaaS model.

VCs have had time to watch the progress of early SaaS companies.  They’ve seen stability and better yet, growth.  Evidence is found in the performance of these four SaaS companies over the past two years (CRM, RNOW, VOCS, and SVVS):

 Comparison of SaaS company stock prices.
(bigger)

It’s no wonder SaaS companies whet the VC community’s collective appetite. IPO valuations of SaaS companies such as SalesForce.com, NetSuite and RightNow Technologies have come in as high as 10X revenue (although not the general case)!  Now there’s a nice exit.

Obviously, SaaS investments come with considerations, both positive and negative.

The Pros

  • Demand from the enterprise IT community
  • Predictable and stable revenue
  • Predictable cashflow and growth
  • The market for SaaS is expected to grow to 25% of all new business software by 2011 (Gartner)
  • SaaS is an easier sell than traditional packaged software
  • See Wainewright’s article for more.

The Cons

  • A longer time to achieve cashflow positive (longer development times and amortized revenue model)
  • Higher startup capital requirements

What do you think? Are you looking to invest in SaaS companies? Are you planning any SaaS deployments within your organization? What’s holding your back? We would love to know your thoughts, share them though comments!

Information and Links

Join the fray by commenting, tracking what others have to say, or linking to it from your blog.


Other Posts
SaaS 101: The Benefits
SaaSCon Recap



Write a Comment

Take a moment to comment and tell us what you think. Some basic HTML is allowed for formatting.

Reader Comments

The SaaS model is the next big thing, and not only for CRM but for many other software appications.

VCs should and must invest in the SaaS model, or they wil be left behind!

Thanks for the info

I was at the TiE Summit in Dec 2006 in India and didnt hear much about SaaS amongst the VC community! Hopefully 2007 will bring more attention to SaaS in India when more companies move up the value chain from being outsourced service providers to product developers.

This article has some interesting information. I have been doing some research on SaaS and its future impact. Some industry strategists such as Sramama Mitra have even coined a term called Enterprise 3.0 which is a combination of the extended enterprise and SaaS. Do check it out Enterprise 3.0 = (SaaS + EE) by Sramana MitraMitra.

[…] In my previous post, I made mention that the true signof SaaS’s arrival is that it has garnered the sincere interest, and better yet dollars, of theinvestment community.Morepeople in a greater array of business rolesare giving SaaS the ol’ thumbs up. […]

[…] The SaaS investment landscape […]

Matt,

I’ve just writen up a blog here at http://unreasonablemen.net/ based on some information i’ve just come accorss. Be really interested in your view.

Paul

[…] For SaaS companies, the tax is even higher. At a perpetual software company, you install inside the firewall. Many security issues for SaaS are taken for granted once you’re inside the firewall. There is a lot of IT glue already in place to enforce things like password policies (it has to change every 90 days except when there is a Harvest Moon, there must be at least 13.5 characters, 1 of which is a symbol from the Greek alphabet, 3 of which are the square root of your Mother’s first pet’s name, yada, yada, yada) and to let other vendors shoulder some of the burden for things like monitoring whether the software is functioning properly. As a SaaS vendor, you have to build all this glue that your perpetual peers take for granted. Is it any wonder that the common wisdom has become that SaaS takes more investment capital? […]

Keeps eyes on a2zapplications.com, India’s First Multi-Tenant, Multi-Utility On-Demand Software Platform. They are targeting SMBs in India and going to rock I guess.

I attended one of their beta sessions and it looks amazing platform where customers can develop their business software in few hours, if not in few days with ZERO IT knowledge.

Thanks for the info, VISIT..http://benchmark-lend-ing.blogspot.com/